After way too long without one, I have a job interview. Even though I am extremely excited about it because it is a job that I really want, I am equally scared for the exact same reason. You spend so much time searching for jobs and internships, applying, networking, doing informational interviews and so much more. Then, when you get an interview you don't know what to do. You've been in one mode and now it's time to switch gears.
So what do you do next? Preparing for an interview can be very taxing. It's the waiting that gets me most. Really, you just want to talk with the employer, share your experience and get more info about the company and the job...now. It's hard to wait a week when you are so excited. I'm like a kid on Christmas morning waiting for my parents to get out of bed. So as I was preparing for my interview I was thinking about all that I needed to do before the date and thought it might help my fellow hunters if I shared some interview info.
Most of these tips come from the book Basic Black by Cathie Black.
One: Be persistent when trying to land an interview. Don't wait for the company to call you. Call them first. This shows initiative and lets the employer know that you are really interested in the position.
Two: Do your research on the company and the person or people interviewing you. You should know what the company does, what the department you’re applying to work in does, who the people are, what they do at the company, what they did before and how to spell their name correctly.
Three: Look Great. You should be dressed appropriately for the job you are interviewing for, and it is always better to be over dressed. Don't wear a mini skirt with stilettos, or either of them alone, actually. Do you hair and nails, iron your clothes, don't go overboard on the perfume, if you wear a skirt wear nylons and always wear closed toed shoes. If you look professional like you are there for a purpose will be taken more seriously as a candidate.
Four: Get there early, but not too early. Make sure you know where you are going and give yourself enough time for traffic, check-in lines and restroom breaks. If you run in at the last second out of breath you might be a little uneasy and they might see it. However, you don't want to arrive too early and be waiting in the lobby for half an hour.
Five: Get the answers to your questions. Make sure you find out what you want to know about the company, who you will report to, what your role will be and anything else that is important to you. It's not just about impressing them, it's also about finding a good fit for you.
Six: Don't talk too much or overstay your welcome. Take cues from them and wrap it up when you need to.
Seven: Be yourself. They would not have called you in for an interview if you weren’t qualified so the best thing you can do is just be yourself.
Eight: Follow up. Send a thank you note immediately following the interview. The note can be hand written or via email. Hand written notes are rationally preferred but many people prefer email notes so it is best to find out what your interviewers prefer.
Have a great interview!!
Monday, August 18, 2008
Monday, August 4, 2008
Helpful job hunt tips from a fellow hunter
I have, it seems, been on a blogging hiatus that lasted way too long. When I say too long I really mean it. I started this blog in October for a college class and have now been a college grad for about five weeks with no posts in the meantime. My return to the blogosphere is long overdue, but I am back in full force.
I, like many of my friends have yet to land a post-grad job and have started to get somewhat discouraged in my job search. As a PR student networking was highlighted as an important tool not only within a job but also to land a job. So I met people, kept in contact with old friends and employers and professional I had met along the way. Even though I did all of this I was still left looking for open positions in the paper and online.
I’m sure many of peers have had the same problem and I am here to help. Even though none of your contacts could help you land a job there is still hope. My advice to you is to make new contacts, while of course maintaining the old ones. Join your local PRSA chapter and other professional groups. Attend social or networking events. Talk to friends who work at places you’re interested in and ask for the name of someone you can contact. Set up informational interviews and keep in contact with your interviewer afterwards. These are all things that will allow you to make new contacts and bring you closer to the job you want. I know that it sounds difficult and can be intimidating but I assure you it will help. Also, look at tips on sites like Monster and Career Builder. They always have helpful articles about job search, improving your cover letter and resume and honing those interview skills. For more tips check out this article.
I, like many of my friends have yet to land a post-grad job and have started to get somewhat discouraged in my job search. As a PR student networking was highlighted as an important tool not only within a job but also to land a job. So I met people, kept in contact with old friends and employers and professional I had met along the way. Even though I did all of this I was still left looking for open positions in the paper and online.
I’m sure many of peers have had the same problem and I am here to help. Even though none of your contacts could help you land a job there is still hope. My advice to you is to make new contacts, while of course maintaining the old ones. Join your local PRSA chapter and other professional groups. Attend social or networking events. Talk to friends who work at places you’re interested in and ask for the name of someone you can contact. Set up informational interviews and keep in contact with your interviewer afterwards. These are all things that will allow you to make new contacts and bring you closer to the job you want. I know that it sounds difficult and can be intimidating but I assure you it will help. Also, look at tips on sites like Monster and Career Builder. They always have helpful articles about job search, improving your cover letter and resume and honing those interview skills. For more tips check out this article.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
1+1= advertising is better than PR?
I have known since the beginning of my college career that there is tension between the advertising and PR professions. This is common knowledge for most, or at least those in the industry or related ones. But I guess I just don’t get it. Maybe it’s my personality, not liking conflict and valuing others opinions and choice of profession. Maybe it’s because, for a brief moment, I thought about going into advertising. Or maybe it’s because I think that, as much as they deny it, advertising and PR must often work together to achieve their goals. But whatever my reasoning for not understanding this tension is, it’s still there.
Georg Kolb posted an interesting comment on his blog about a panel he recently attended. The event put on by TurnPRon was about, "Communication 2.0 - The Convergence of PR, Advertising, Media and the Consumer". The question was, "PR vs. Advertisers: Can't We All Just Get Along?". He had a lot of interesting things to say about the discussion that evening, but the part that struck me the most was a comment from another attendee. The woman, who would not share her name, said, “Web 2.0 is good for advertising, and I'm in advertising, so I'm all for advertising and against PR." What? First, who would go to a panel with professionals from both PR and Advertising and make a comment like that? According to Kolb there was no explanation that followed; this was it. I would like to know why she thinks Web 2.0 is good for advertising but not PR, and how this makes advertising better than PR.
After I read this, I was reminded of a history class I took during the 2004 presidential election. We were required to post a comment once a week on a class discussion board and comment on one person’s post. Most of the class members took the time to express their political views, which should have been a great way to jump start class discussion. However, most of the comments consisted of one person saying, “You should vote for Bush because he is better than Kerry,” or “I don’t know why anyone would vote for Bush, Kerry is so much cooler.” This was a college course but few people could actually explain why they were voting for a particular candidate over the other.
This seems to be the case with this woman. She is in advertising and Web 2.0 is good, so 1+1= advertising is better than PR? How so? I wonder how good she is at her job, because I’m not convinced. At the end of the day I wouldn’t take what this woman has to say too seriously unless she can start backing it up.
Georg Kolb posted an interesting comment on his blog about a panel he recently attended. The event put on by TurnPRon was about, "Communication 2.0 - The Convergence of PR, Advertising, Media and the Consumer". The question was, "PR vs. Advertisers: Can't We All Just Get Along?". He had a lot of interesting things to say about the discussion that evening, but the part that struck me the most was a comment from another attendee. The woman, who would not share her name, said, “Web 2.0 is good for advertising, and I'm in advertising, so I'm all for advertising and against PR." What? First, who would go to a panel with professionals from both PR and Advertising and make a comment like that? According to Kolb there was no explanation that followed; this was it. I would like to know why she thinks Web 2.0 is good for advertising but not PR, and how this makes advertising better than PR.
After I read this, I was reminded of a history class I took during the 2004 presidential election. We were required to post a comment once a week on a class discussion board and comment on one person’s post. Most of the class members took the time to express their political views, which should have been a great way to jump start class discussion. However, most of the comments consisted of one person saying, “You should vote for Bush because he is better than Kerry,” or “I don’t know why anyone would vote for Bush, Kerry is so much cooler.” This was a college course but few people could actually explain why they were voting for a particular candidate over the other.
This seems to be the case with this woman. She is in advertising and Web 2.0 is good, so 1+1= advertising is better than PR? How so? I wonder how good she is at her job, because I’m not convinced. At the end of the day I wouldn’t take what this woman has to say too seriously unless she can start backing it up.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Bad PR
I recently read this post on Second City Style and thought it was quite interesting. Lately it seems there has been a lot of bad PR being practiced. Maybe I’m just noticing it more or maybe due to the Internet and blogging it is becoming more publicized, but it seems that everywhere I look PR professionals are doing something wrong.
Granted, we do have to pitch stories, news and products. We have to call magazines and newspapers and send samples, but people do this every day and it’s no big deal. Obviously it’s not an easy job. I know this. I have had to call the newspapers, T.V. stations and magazines. I have had to field phone calls and deal with unhappy people; I know that this world can be brutal. People make mistakes in their jobs every day. Doctors make mistakes in life and death situations. I think it’s understandable if a PR person makes a mistake every now and again. We’re all human.
The problem with the PR pros I’m seeing is that they are making errors that are 100 percent avoidable. It does not take a degree to realize that when someone says they don’t want what you are sending or it is not going to work at that time, you should say okay and leave them alone. You shouldn’t harass them in hopes of changing their mind. It’s never good when a PR pro has their e-mail address blocked or when one person’s mistakes lose a client for a firm.
The thing is, is that while most PR pros are out there working hard and doing a great job, some are out there undoing all the work that others have done. There are people like this everywhere giving their field a bad reputation. But, when it is your job to be a communicator, a representative or a person who builds up reputations and trust, you can’t be a person who people can’t trust.
Granted, we do have to pitch stories, news and products. We have to call magazines and newspapers and send samples, but people do this every day and it’s no big deal. Obviously it’s not an easy job. I know this. I have had to call the newspapers, T.V. stations and magazines. I have had to field phone calls and deal with unhappy people; I know that this world can be brutal. People make mistakes in their jobs every day. Doctors make mistakes in life and death situations. I think it’s understandable if a PR person makes a mistake every now and again. We’re all human.
The problem with the PR pros I’m seeing is that they are making errors that are 100 percent avoidable. It does not take a degree to realize that when someone says they don’t want what you are sending or it is not going to work at that time, you should say okay and leave them alone. You shouldn’t harass them in hopes of changing their mind. It’s never good when a PR pro has their e-mail address blocked or when one person’s mistakes lose a client for a firm.
The thing is, is that while most PR pros are out there working hard and doing a great job, some are out there undoing all the work that others have done. There are people like this everywhere giving their field a bad reputation. But, when it is your job to be a communicator, a representative or a person who builds up reputations and trust, you can’t be a person who people can’t trust.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Careful, you could be next
If you have not yet read Chris Anderson’s post on his blog, The Long Tail, you should. It’s a must-read for PR people.
I have to admit, after I read the post I had mixed feelings. I wasn’t sure if I cared that much about it, but the more I thought about it the more I realized what a joke these PR people are. I realized that some day, if I’m not careful, that could be me.
I am still a student but even as an undergraduate in PR I understand that no one wants or is going to read 300 emails from people they don’t know. I can barely read all the emails I get each day from people I know. It should be common knowledge not to send a generic press release to the editor in chief of a major publication. It should be one of those situations where you stop and think, “Would I want an email from someone I don’t know that has nothing to do with me or my work?” As PR professionals this just should not happen.
I liked what Seth Godin had to say about the mass emails of bad pitches. If you are not going to make the effort to figure out who the email should go to or if it even pertains to that person or company, then why should that person even read it? Everyone these days is strapped for time and a good PR practitioner knows this. A good PR practitioner will figure out who the email should go to and tailor their message accordinly. If the message pertains to that person, is tailored specifically for them, and is clear and concise, the pitch is more likely to be a successful one.
I have to admit, after I read the post I had mixed feelings. I wasn’t sure if I cared that much about it, but the more I thought about it the more I realized what a joke these PR people are. I realized that some day, if I’m not careful, that could be me.
I am still a student but even as an undergraduate in PR I understand that no one wants or is going to read 300 emails from people they don’t know. I can barely read all the emails I get each day from people I know. It should be common knowledge not to send a generic press release to the editor in chief of a major publication. It should be one of those situations where you stop and think, “Would I want an email from someone I don’t know that has nothing to do with me or my work?” As PR professionals this just should not happen.
I liked what Seth Godin had to say about the mass emails of bad pitches. If you are not going to make the effort to figure out who the email should go to or if it even pertains to that person or company, then why should that person even read it? Everyone these days is strapped for time and a good PR practitioner knows this. A good PR practitioner will figure out who the email should go to and tailor their message accordinly. If the message pertains to that person, is tailored specifically for them, and is clear and concise, the pitch is more likely to be a successful one.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
PR It's What We Do - continued
Check out this article written by Patti D. Hill, president and founder of BlabberMouth PR . She talks about the importance of strategic planning and plan implementation in public relations.
http://aboutpublicrelations.net/uchill1.htm
http://aboutpublicrelations.net/uchill1.htm
PR It's What We Do
Every time I meet someone for the first time they ask me what I do. They ask what I am studying and what I want to do when I get out of school. For the most part when I tell people I am a Public Relations major they follow up with, "so what exactly do you do in public relations?" In the past, as in, before I had any real experience, I would simply describe the type of job I wanted after I graduated and hope this would satisfy their curiosity. Sometimes, I would say something along the lines of "well, I would like to build the face of a company from the ground up." Needless to say, that response really didn't help others understand, or for that matter, help me understand what public relations practitioners actually do. But recently I read a brief description of the public relations profession that I found intriguing. It is from Tom Hagley's Writing Winning Proposals PR Cases. He says that, "In public relations, we influence behavior through strategic planning and communication." As I thought about it more I realized that this is exactly what we do.
I spent the summer as a public relations intern planning an event. We spent time calling people for donations and trying to get people to sponsor. We sent out press releases, hoping to entice the media to write or broadcast something about us. We held a press conference, gave out press kits, held interviews, ran commercials, ads, the whole bit. So does this mean we succeeded as public relations practitioners? Well, just because we did all of these things doesn't mean that we did them right. There is more to PR than simply sending out a press release or press kit. These things have to be strategically placed or released. They have to be sent to the right people at the right time. And there is a lot to be said for having and maintaining a good relationship with the media.
So, if we correctly identified who should receive our media day invitation then delivered it to them at the appropriate time and followed up with a phone call, ideally they would show up. And they did. They showed up for the press conference, conducted interviews, participated in all the activities planned for the day, and then wrote or broadcast stories about the event. Through "strategic planning and communication" we successfully practiced public relations.
Public relations is not about deceiving people or tricking them into doing something they would never do. It is about communicating something so well that they can make the best possible decision for themselves. If your company, event, client, etc. is actually who and what they say they are and the pr practitioner has communicated this effectively, people will choose you.
I spent the summer as a public relations intern planning an event. We spent time calling people for donations and trying to get people to sponsor. We sent out press releases, hoping to entice the media to write or broadcast something about us. We held a press conference, gave out press kits, held interviews, ran commercials, ads, the whole bit. So does this mean we succeeded as public relations practitioners? Well, just because we did all of these things doesn't mean that we did them right. There is more to PR than simply sending out a press release or press kit. These things have to be strategically placed or released. They have to be sent to the right people at the right time. And there is a lot to be said for having and maintaining a good relationship with the media.
So, if we correctly identified who should receive our media day invitation then delivered it to them at the appropriate time and followed up with a phone call, ideally they would show up. And they did. They showed up for the press conference, conducted interviews, participated in all the activities planned for the day, and then wrote or broadcast stories about the event. Through "strategic planning and communication" we successfully practiced public relations.
Public relations is not about deceiving people or tricking them into doing something they would never do. It is about communicating something so well that they can make the best possible decision for themselves. If your company, event, client, etc. is actually who and what they say they are and the pr practitioner has communicated this effectively, people will choose you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
